There are three pieces of biblical text that seem to me to be entwined. Wrapped tight together like fishnets ‘round a thigh, or cod as the case may be. They are three passages that I have not read in full, or together, in a long time.
Some of you may recognize them and others may not. They do apply full force and whole heartedly to some of the eye changes that have occurred on BlogStream, and the World, over the last year or so.
I know some may not dig some of this religious scripture stuff and may kick up some dust and raise a real stink about me writing it. Well, that is for some, and any who know me, or know the word, will be able to (or should be able to) cast it all aside and see what I am saying as it may apply to each and all of us.
Especially this one.
I will take first from the book of Esther and “Haman’s Rage Against Mordecai”.
From Esther 5:9 - 5:14:
“Haman went out that day happy and in high spirits. But when he saw Mordecai at the king’s gate and observed that he neither rose not showed fear in his presence, he was filled with rage against Mordecai. Nevertheless, Haman restrained himself and went home.
‘Calling together his friends and Zeresh, his wife, Haman boasted to them about his vast wealth, his many sons, and all the ways the king had honored him and how he had elevated him above the other nobles and officials. ‘And that’s not all’, Haman added, ‘I’m the only person Queen Esther invited to accompany the king to the banquet she gave. And she has invited me along with the king tomorrow. But all this gives me no satisfaction as long as I see that Jew Mordecai sitting at the king’s gate.’
‘His wife Zaresh and all his friends said to him, ‘Have a gallows built, seventy five feet high, and ask the king in the morning to have Mordecai hanged on it. Then go with the king to dinner and be happy.’ This suggestion delighted Haman, and he had the gallows built”
To this next set of words am I driven and my parallel continues, "Judges".
Deuteronomy 16:18 - 16:20:
“Appoint judges and officials for each of your tribes in every town the Lord your God is giving you, and they shall judge the people fairly. Do not pervert justice or show partiality. Do not accept a bribe, for a bribe blinds the eyes of the wise and twists the words of the righteous. Follow justice and justice alone, so that you may live and posses the land the Lord your God is giving you.”
I know, I know, an instant parallel, right? Mmmmmm … Well, it may be but here is the third of the four parts. Reflecting this onto ourselves with a smidgen of intelligence and a tad bit of logic is how we get it all to make some damned sense. It must apply and apply it shall.
We now move onward to the story of "Gideon’s Death".
Judges 8:28 - 8:35:
“Thus Midian was subdued before the Israelites and did not raise it’s head again. During Gideon’s lifetime, the land enjoyed peace forty years.
‘Jerub-Baal son of Joash went back home to live. He had seventy sons of his own, for he had many wives. His concubine, who lived in Shechem, also bore him a son, whom he named Abimelech. Gideon son of Joash died at a good old age and was buried in the tomb of his father Joash in Ophrah of the Abiezrites.
‘No sooner had Gideon died than the Israelites again prostituted themselves to the Baals. They set up Baal-Berith as their god and did not remember the Lord their God, who had rescued them from the hands of all their enemies on every side. They also failed to show kindness to the family of Jerub-Baal (that is, Gideon) for all the good things he had done for them.”
So what is it that ties these three stories together beyond faith? What is the moral to each and then onto all three as a bizarrely stitched together trilogy; a thrice fold lesson to be learnt?
We all want to blame our lack of literal and intelligent translation, as a reason not to read ancient texts that revolve around faith. If it is not the out of touch literally, it is the over the top spiritual aspects of televangelist lead ins to some nasty ass show at 4 a.m. on a Sunday, that only old women with too many cats and doilies are watching that prevent us from taking it to heart. But when we just read them all for what they are (and are not), and just read - over a bit of inflection and self attention do we maybe begin to see their timeless glow, their glory.
You can take from all books and go on this rocket ride of superimposed transparencies that we flip over and over ourselves like a bad biology text book that never shows the dirty pictures we all really want to see when we are forced to read the texts. That is the wonder of any religious text. It should not be showing you the dirty parts. Those are each of our parts - my parts, your parts, our parts. They are not everyone else’s. A million dates, but intimacies are one to a kind - one of itself to remember and hold onto forever.
We make any religious scripture seem too out dated or not modern enough and that occurs solely when we are not applied to the word at hand; we have too many hang ups to accept the words for what they are and look at ourselves through them. We are scared, embarrassed, distracted.
No religious text has been TiVo’d and served with Fritos and cheese dip. All must be read and taken through ourselves in order to become one with ourselves.
Those who do not read any religious text and deny any spiritual existence are called Atheists, which is commonly confused with being Agnostic, a searcher of what they temporarily deny to be truth or significant. I can understand the confusion of being an Agnostic. I can only sum up being an Atheist as an attempt to procure the survival of individualism at all costs regardless of rationale or logic.
Why is it so damned hard for us all to admit that we are all one of the same;each from a big bag of peas falling from one big pod?
Would it really hurt to embrace a bit of the same in order to find out how profound our own individualism is?
The death of fashion in the early to mid eighties was enough for all living at the time to bear.
On that note you had two split factions: Those who refused to buy the designer chic and those who were the designer chic. There was no more ‘make up your look in the morning and prepare it for a good wash that night‘. Now you bought big or dressed a bit less big. Either way you made a statement but it was much more black and white going into the hodgepodge of acceptance in the late eighties and early nineties. Fashion is still blurred because of wanting to be a Lego so you fit, but wanting your Lego to be a different colour so you stand out.
To conform or make a mark?
To read or not to read?
Most are wondering why they just did!
Whether it be just me or fashion or religion, I do know how to survive and have faith in doing so.
I take all so lightly that most think I am the Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde of empathy. I have even looked into a possible Asperger’s diagnosis.
I know what stinks. Feet, cheese, and shit. All three are around us most of the time.
Not the words of Gloria Gaynor, but rather Moses from the book of Exodus.
Exodus 32:18:
“Moses replied,
‘It is not the sound of victory,
It is not the sound of defeat;
It is the sound of singing that I hear.’”
Sing Nightingale, sing.
For songs are those moments that remind us of when we are …