"Indifferently" will be disputed. It is a reference to their attitude towards the law not anything else. Today is riddled with insanity. The definition of insanity is doing something over and over again expecting different results. Today is cuckoo. I have three points on this subject of silly today. If you want more out of this post read my previous posts on the same subject (Lewd and Lascivious Latitudes Lingering Long in Lies: Bonus Is As Bonus Does, Monday Make-up Make-out: Triple play, Trifecta, or Was it Just a Hat-Trick?, Bonus: Diatribe Deux; Dourly Dose Deservedly Damned Due Doom, Truancy, Trafalgar, Tumultuous Testaments: Where, oh Where, is that Bunny Trail?).

OK. I live in Southern California. I grew up in New England. I see and understand how this can be a crucial or non crucial  topic around the country depending on where you live. Someone living in Northern Maine is probably not interested as much with this debate as I am being just two hours North of the border. Two aside points made before the meat of today's meal:

Today was the funeral of a Deanza Middle School student named Anthony Soltero of Ontario, CA. He blew his brains out a couple weeks ago after a Vice Principal threatened detention, juvenile hall, and parental fiscal fines. It is all because of the opposition to this Middle School students apparent need to protest. It has nothing to do with mental illness, access to a gun, or family life. It is all because of the school authorities preservation of rules and laws that would prevent the 14 year old student from walking out of school in order to protest. The Vice Principal is the one to blame. We should hang that son of a bitch from the tallest tree and all have the opportunity to wack him like a pinata. Obviously the school authority gave him the gun and sent him home to an empty house with the ideas of jail for three years or a big gaping blood red hole gushing fluid. This is a real story. This is the media and lawyer slant on this. This is sad. But the religious overtones and cryptic mythology of the catholic church along with the fear factor ILLEGAL immigrants face combines to make for a new ILLEGAL immigrant martyr. Too bad Anthony was not ILLEGAL. Exploiting this story to get us to legalize something that is justifiably ILLEGAL is pathetic.

The other thing to focus on would be the ILLEGALs that we are actually prosecuting. I am limp on the facts to these two examples as I can not find a link to the story but I am sure it came from the Chicago Sun Times. We are not letting the Holle Orchestra from Britain into the country to perform for some dumb ass trivial reason. And we have found it ok to deport widows (who were legal upon marriage and having children) of the deceased from the 9/11 tragedy. What kind of world do we live in?

This brings us to today's festivities. March, march , marching on. No more Mexican flags. Latino leaders and radio personalities for the Latino community have made that clear. "Bring your American flags", they screamed to their listeners , over and over again. Cardinal Mahoney and L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa have made it clear that the ILLEGAL immigrant population is meant to be here and are more than welcome. Villaraigosa exclaimed, "We work hard and play by the rules". What rules? The rules that make most of the protesters ILLEGAL? Today in L.A. there is a march going on as I type this. It was meant to have seven speaking pulpit stops along the way. They had catchy names like religion, justice, prosperity and future. It seems that the "parade" route has become confused. With maps in hand the protesters are foregoing speaking stops such as future, prosperity and justice and moving on. The ironic part of all of this is that the misdirected protesters are moving South as opposed to North in their misguided fervor. If only they would really just go back South. I thought all of these desperate individuals seeking freedom and economic gain were familiar with maps and compass points after their long desert treks. It takes everything I have to not laugh out loud as I think about it.

You know who should be pissed about this more than anyone? The African American population. Most 18-30 year old black males are the ones that the jobs are being stolen from. Why is no one speaking up for that? Oh yeah they are still reeling in the years for the Tookie Williams execution. Let me see if I understand the fight for the NAACP. ILLEGAL immigrants: good; and convicted killer Tookie Williams: good. Seems like a whole lot of law breaking to me. I heard one Africna American participant of today's protest exclaim that Bush is the Anti-Christ. Does this woman live in a cave? Bush is for all of the ILLEGAL's becoming citizens via amnesty. Obviously she has her head in the sand.

The other point to make is that there are truly no indigenous people here in North America. Even American Indians came here from Africa and China across land bridges in the now Bering strait and across "kelp highways" that christened the coasts of our continents at on time or another. If "we are the people that belong here" is the fight then we all need a history and archeological lesson in regards to the progression of culture, society, and population. No one "belongs" here. I bet the dinosaurs are pissed we all took over. To T-Rex, we are all ILLEGAL. Rulings and possesion of war and law are why it is ours. Let Mexico try to come kick our ass in another war. It won't happen, so this is the war at hand. Bring it on. I am part native American and I have no gripe because non of us are really native. Try explaining that to Ward Churchill.

There is a quote going around the internet that might put this into true Presidential perspective seeing as our current President has brain mush in regards to this topic. G.W. this is what a great President said: "In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person’s becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American…There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag… We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language… and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.” -Theodore Roosevelt 1907.

Well, I may be around long enough to see this issue out as my plans for departure have been pushed off. I am going to forgo tomorrow night's post and get back to my Mon-Wed-Fri schedule with some bonus posts to sprinkle in. Until my departure I will be here hoping for the departure of law breakers. As you all sigh and sulk I wait for Wednesday's post ...

I am not going to eat up alot of time with this one. I touched base on the subject in my last post with the sports team thing towards the end. Sports teams need a little bitch slap and I am here right now to briefly do so.

I come from a huge family of sports. My grandfather went to Michigan state full scholarship for basketball. My uncle played football for Virginia State. I have two aunts who played basketball at Yale and one is now a Assistant Head Coach for a predominant New England College and their women's basketball program. I played soccer and football and baseball. I finally settled on wrestling and did so for two and a half years in High School. I can not get into sports, especially team sports.

I would like to say in the defense of sports that I do think them sacred. I get very upset when frisbee, or poker, or ping pong is considered a sport. I also do not think speed walking is a sport or any other solo endeavor that has exercise, not athletic, prowess. Triatholon, biking, running these are solo sports that should not be discredited by underwater basket weaving.

I do however object whole heartedly with my tax dollars going to fund something that I won't participate in or somewhere that I will never go. G.W. Bush got his elite Rangers a new stadium built from tax dollars, increased the retail value of the team and got out with tons of moohlah to follow. I paid for part of this man's career and lifestyle.

Our now fab President is not the only one guilty. It happens from Minnesota to Boston, Chicago to Cinicinatti, and it will be happening here in L.A. soon as the area fights for it's "right" to have a Professional Football Team.

If I do watch sports it is more about drinking, eating, and socializing; it is not about the game. I like going to a game every now and then (like about once every five to eight years) and I like the experience of the old parks and the tradition more than I like the game or the eight dollar mixed drink in the neon girlie-girl cup. Rebuilding Fenway Park in order to boost revenue under the guise of updating and renovating is a farce and quite frankly offensive. Leave Fenway alone.

The twenty seven year proposed cost of the new park in Cincinatti is over one billion dollars. You better bet your bottom dollar that most of that is from the tax payers.

I will stop paying taxes entirely to the state of California if they do the same thing here for football.

It does not generate more revenue for the city. The money is spent on ten dollar hot dogs and seventy five dollar team shirts; not to mention those eight dollar programs. No one is going to mom and pop's pizza next door after dropping that kinda dime.

If you think any business in America is actually planning business meetings or conventions around where the best stadium is you need to empty the drool cup and take your medicine. They are not unless it is Super Bowl, Stanley Cup or World Series plus any of the play off games. Even when they do the money is going to the same places it would if the game were not in consideration. Restaurants, bars, hotel, and strip clubs.

I am sick and tired of tax dollars getting stripped from me to go towards things that honestly have no bearing on my existance. I know right now everyone could give some big long sports fan lecture as to why it is a good thing or a slap down from an economist telling me that it does benefit me from a regional point of view. Bah Hum Bug! It isn't. It won't.

People keep telling me that not having a cell phone is effecting my existence as well and I still don't have one and probably (hopefully) never will.

Play ball all you want. Hell, bet like demon fire on all the games. Sit in drool and puke and fritos and watch every game until you don't recognize your kids or your spouse. But don't make me pay for a place for to all go down in. Don't make me responsible for football in L.A.

You can find lot's about this subject if you google hard enough. I just thought I would rant about it ala opine and let someone else spew forth the facts. I am quite sure I will write about this again and I promise to throw out some of those facts when I do.

Some of you are old enough to remember what a promise means. Do you know what movie I stole that from though? Until tomorrow I will wah wah wah myself to sleep ...

The best man in my wedding was a man who I will always have an over abundance of respect for. My grandmother referred to him as her "little rastafari". His real name was David. We met line cooking at a restaurant named the "Peg Leg" in Rockport, MA. David was getting ready to graduate high school and go off to culinary school. He did a year in Massachusetts and then a year in Colorado and then had a change of heart. He debated going to New Jersey to attend the world renowned tracker school run by Tom Brown Jr. (http://www.trackerschool.com/) thinking he could use his training there in order to get some sort of outdoor profession such as a ranger or the like. He now lives in the Pioneer Valley of Massachusetts and for a while was a Beaver Management Specialist. From cooking to Indians to beaver, I still have respect for this man that sometimes I do not always agree with but always find a reason to laugh with.

I, however, have no respect for Ward Churchill (http://www.makingthelinksradio.ca/Main_Page/Ward%20Churchill%20Bio.htm). Is it a leap to go from David to Ward? Not really. The Indian connection. Ward is always "cooking" something up. And beavers are just beavers and in some way mean something to everyone wether they know it or not. Both start out at the same square on the game board. Peace loving, nature enthused, very liberal, understanding, compassionate and passionate all getting ready to go in two very different directions. Peace, as a motive, can be used in two veins. David still loves, listens, and learns. Ward Churchill is a destructive force of loud shouting propaganda and generalizations "aim"ed to engage the youthful minds of idealization on college campuses that swirl with arrogant and disrespectful eye rolling and ultra casual stances and body language that scream "fuck you" with their slacker slouches.

For this piece I can really only throw out some links and let you read away. I myself am disgusted by this man and there is too much information to regurgitate out for you all to consume like baby birds.

Mr. Churchill was on Hannity and Colms last night debating with David Horowitz. Of course there were many exchanges between him and Hannity (Sean has been trying to get him on the show for over a year) as well as Colms , who respects Churchill's free speach but does not agree with or condone what he says. The video clip (http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player05.html?040606/040606_hc_churchill&Hannity_Colmes&Ward%20Chuchill&acc&Hannity%20%26%20Colmes&-1&new) is definitely worth the twenty minute watch that it requires. Watch Churchills body language. Smell his arrogance through the screen. A truly repulsive man who was so close to actually being some one worthy of time energy and respect. I wonder what makes a liberal go that bad. The talking points and the redundancy of them is just as revolting as his slouch. I will let the clip prove the point.

Last year the American Thinker (http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=4226) had a piece about Ward after he made some very disturbing and perturbing comments in regards to 9/11. Some of his comments were: "Let's get a grip here, shall we? True enough, they were civilians" — meaning the people killed on 9/11 — "but innocent? Give me a break." and the ever more popular ""If there was a better, more effective or, in fact, any other way of visiting some penalty befitting their participation upon the little Eichmanns and the sterile sanctuary of the Twin Towers, I'd really be interested in hearing about it."  The man is insane.

I understand on the outskirts what his point is. I can even comprehend how he was going about teaching it. Devil's advocate is a powerfull tool. When the advocation is stripped and exchanged for diatribe tantrums you are left with nothing but Devil. According to Mr. Churchill we have no right to complain or be sorrowful about the 9/11 attacks because we are mean and hurtfull to other innocents around the world. You get what you give. You get what you deserve. Ward Churchill should be getting drawn and quartered any day if this is true.

He claims he is a Native American. There are many disputes about this man's past but he still claims his native heritage. He is very involved in that sect of our society. He is even part of the Leonard Peltier defense project. Good for him. He is also part of the ridiculous sport team logo and mascot fury. Bad for him. I do not watch or play sports. I couldn't care less about athletic events unless it involves me drinking alot of booze and eating alot and really not watching the games at all. This being said, I do not understand the overly inflated fuss made about mascots. Churchill vehemently disagrees with my view point and does so deliciously in his article, "Crimes Against Humanity" (http://www.dickshovel.com/crimes.html). In order to make it fair in Ward's eyes we should have other sports teams called the Niggers, the Kykes, the Zipperheads, and the Wetbacks. Mr. Serling, Mr. Rod Serling, you have a telephone call, Mr. Serling telephone call.

I am a white heterosexual man. By the standards of Churchill's rhetoric, Blacks, Native Americans, the Irish, the Jews, Latinos, Homosexuals, and probably Space Aliens all have the right to kick my ass for some act perpetrated against them by straight white men in history. Everyone except the missing link is in trouble by these standards. Soon Sasquatch will be ruling the world not killing or hurting anything out of fear. Big Foot will starve to death and the world will be an empty place that Ward Churchill can look up at from hell and laugh at his pet project having grasped victory.

I really can add no more. If you just skim the links I have included  while thinking rationally you will realize this man must be feared. He must be watched. He must be debated and shut down at every chance. He is the reason to fear the left just as readers of the Turner Diaries are a reason to fear the right.

"MAN, in his ignorance, identifies himself with the material sheaths that encompass his true self. Transcending these, he becomes one with Brahman, who is pure bliss", Taittiriya - The Upinishads. This is what Dave knows that Ward does not. Such a pity. 

I will be here tomorrow as well as straight through until Wednesday night. I have a pending farewell, a hiatus, a sabatical. I may not be here for a couple months starting on Thursday so until then posts, posts, posts ...

"Count 'em out Cratchet, you dumb son of a bitch. Count 'em out loud and strong!" This would be the rally cry of the new and improved Scrooge. There would be no mince pie mincing. No flowery language of proper and dignified girth. There would be no fire or logs or coal nevermind the question of wether or not fuel should be used. A simple shout into the face of the one serving. Do it now! Or simply die in the cold of your own malnutritioned drool of gruel. Was it sad to be Scrooge or good ol' Bob? What about that tiny fellow named Tim? Ahhhh, come on, that was before the military industrial complex that has pierced our livers since WWII.

I received an E-mail today baiting, or chumming as it were (pun fully intended), the idea of over paid Congressmen and their almighty benefits. Did any of you get the same E-mail. I am assuming it was of chain variety since it tempted me with it's Siren's call to forward it on. I did not, as I do not forward chains of any shade. It did make me remember my earlier inclinations to revoke and redistribute the pay of the government talking heads and actually get the money doing something hot for either side. I thought about it as I read and I became more fervent. I did a little research after my browsing. I found a couple things.

One: It is hard to find out exactly how much is being made/fleeced without sending letters to the government. (I am sure alot of you found it quicker than I, but I used three search engines and an endless array of word forming and after about forty-five minutes found a "sort of answer". If you found or find better results let me know - my sources are always cited)

Two: Not much has changed. Inflation is a powerful thing. (Keep in mind I live in Southern California - the real estate bitch whore - where a crap ass two bedroom house with no property, in the middle of gang infested Compton, goes for over 400,000 - that is NOT a typo! - needless to say I rent)

Ok so the E-mail goes on and on like the endless incense stick of some time from long ago about wether or not Congressmen deserve what is given to them in regards to retirement. I am tie-dying the bill right now. The tapestry of fiscal fraught is now hung above me on the ceiling for my trip outs. Sometimes being involved in civic duty is like being a Dead Head - "What a long strange trip it HAS been."

Like a latin rythm, that is not ILLEGAL, I slide on over, with rump a shakin', and take on the partner of Congressional pay out in some sort of tango or meringue that only holds the fury of a fiery soul.

The E-mail tries to explain that retired Congressmen make about a thousand dollars a month in retirement. The E-mail is deceiving in the fact that it implies that it is just benefits and not retirement pay. It is a combination of both "pension" as well as health and post position pandering positions that come up with the figure. It is alot more than what the E-mail would lend to. No where near 1,000 dollars per month. As of 2003, the 400 plus retired members of congress individually receive approximately 3,909 dollars per month.

OK, so let's go back to the beginning and discuss some figures and how they relate to now, as well as what my opinion is in regards to civil service retribution in modern times. I do not need Sly and the Family Stone to tell me I am living in a world where I "can't get next to you". Fiscally, I would die to be one of these dumb ass sons of bitches! I understand their duty and effort. I recognize their triumphs and tribulations and what it means financially but it should not be a consideration as much as it should be a gratitude.

Let's look at the twenty seventh amendment to the Constitution ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-seventh_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution). What the hell, it's fun right? The Constitution, the thing that let's you breathe, is the law of the land. It limits increases in a very vague sense. The only way you can upgrade the salaries of the Congress is to increase it once you are already in session as not to affect your term. In this day and age it does not work since they are career ghasts and ghosts that haunt our wallets daily. This is what allowed the Cost Of Living Adjustment's (C.O.L.A.) to slide by as non pay increases but rather increases of necessity. Originally it was referred to as the "Madison Amendment" which in it's own right is fall down on the floor laughable as this piece will shortly prove in comparison to where we are now and how we got here so blindly. It went from it's initial vague form to the 1788 North Carolina proposition of, "The laws ascertaining the compensation of senators and representatives, for their services, shall be postponed in their operation until after the election of representatives immediately succeeding the passing thereof; that excepted which shall first be passed on the subject." It then turned to, "That the Compensation for the Senators and Representatives be ascertained by standing law; and that no alteration of the existing rate of Compensation shall operate for the Benefit of the Representatives, until after a subsequent Election shall have been had." by New York. The big NYC had it's verbiage almost right and the most right for the time. But we went to the more vague verbiage in the original discussion, "No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened." That is the Twenty Seventh Amendment. I not only shrug my shoulders and scratch my brow but I worry like a S.O.B. about what that means for us now in the hands of mis-interpretation that fumble around the ball and manipulate Rubik's cube of sociology and economics. The history of the 27th amendment is humorous at the least and should be viewed and contemplated by anyone paying money into the system and/or participating in it.

So, let's talk Big Ben Franklin. The man personally is my hero, and beyond others, is the true founder of our country. He is the reason we all inhale and exhale and the reason we can do anything in between those two actions. Benny boy is the man! Mr. Franklin wanted no pay to these civil servants meant to help and form society by societies means and wants and needs. On the fab website http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa031200a.htm they have a Franklin moment as, "During the Constitutional Convention, Benjamin Franklin considered proposing that elected government officials not be paid for their service. Other Founding Fathers, however, decided otherwise."  Of course they did! Dumb ass son's of bitches! None of them should be paid more than their books and libraries and papers and consulting should pay them. They are greedy ass tri colored ass baboons for thinking otherwise!

I agree with Mister Franklin, as I most always do, no pay to these dumb  (or too smart for our wallets) Representatives. I don't think the president should get paid. In this system  government leaders, on a fedral level, should not get paid beyond the honor and duty that is intrinsic in the position. Am I wrong? It should be a privilege.

"From 1789 to 1815, members of Congress received only a per diem (daily payment) of $6.00 while in session. Members began receiving an annual salary in 1815, when they were paid $1,500 per year." Yes, from the same site and the same Ben Franklin. Let's look at this.

$1500 per year in 1815 is equal to making a 13,178.16 dollars a year now. Maybe not much. I do not make much more. Should they make much more? Currently they make approx. $ 165,200 which was 18,803.43 dollars in 1815. The national deficit in 1815 was 99,833,660.15 dollars. Today that is worth 877,082,395.72 dollars. MMMMMM. What did the .72 cents buy?

The deficit for 2005 was 7,782,155,135,998.03 which in 1815 would be 885,801,647,454.34 there is a bit of a difference but it is relative.

Extreme war, extreme spending, extreme protection - even if from ourselves. After world war two our deficit was 136,696,090,324.90 which in modern economics is 1,549,462,411,824.63. Are these differences measuring up?

Money and numbers have a way of tugging on emotion as well as they do logic. But these comparison's might shed a certain light on it all. Two sites to help are: http://www.thisnation.com/budget-facts.html and http://www.westegg.com/inflation/. These are two very, very important sites. Use them.

The war of 1812 is finally now serving a purpose. It should no longer be thought of as the forgotten war but rather the war that we are fighting again now. A bit different I know but it in principle it is the same. Extraordinary debt and sacrifice for being attacked on home turf. If Madison were around today with the 9-11 thing, would Dolly's cookies be so popular? I think not!

Sad, sad world.

I think these fools should not be paid. They should, with joy, help to change where our nation and the world are going. They should make things better and iron out differences: priceless!

Put the plastic back in my pocket - if it were there to begin with! Bonus rounds abound as it seems I will be gone for a bit as of the 13th. Rock on and read it! Stay smart until tomorrow when I dumb you down a bit for a bonus ...

One little, two little, three little Indians. How many "Indians" will be left in twenty years when we open up the ILLEGAL immigration debate again. How many different ways will the nomenclature of this mythical beast wiggle and waggle away from the true name "ILLEGAL immigrant"? How many Senators will be holding their shameful heads low as they scurry around looking for the vote of tomorrow? I am not sure what tomorrow will bring us but based on today and yesterday it will probably be a brim filled bucket of amnesty slowly lowered hopefully into Hell. There's a hole in the bucket dear Liza, dear Liza. There's a hole in the border too. Get Yankee Doodle Dandy to stop killing Indians for feathers. The macaroni's over here Senator and it hasn't even begun to heat up.

Does Harry Reid (http://reid.senate.gov/) really exist? I think he might be one really down trodden robot wacked out on Prozac and Halcion pretending to know what the hell is going on. Did he get elected on a bet? Or quite possibly he was one of the "pilots" escaping from Area 51 before they moved it's operations to Colorado. Regardless of where he is from or what runs through his mind, he needs to go. He is one of the most outspoken amnesty blabbers beyond Kennedy. Yesterday the story broke about Reid's 1993 Immigration Bill. You can read about the Reid bill at: http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49609 Pretty funny stuff. One of my favorite quotes from the now Senate Minority Leader is, "Safeguards like welfare and free medical care are in place to boost Americans in need of short-term assistance. These programs were not meant to entice freeloaders and scam artists from around the world." This man WANTS an amnesty bill. Shortly after the bill was proposed  and after Reid had a sit down scolding from his wife (who has immigrant parents), He apologized for seeming anti immigrant and withdrew the bill. Seven months later he re introduced it. It was then withdrawn again. One year after that he introduced a bill exactly like his previous two immigration bills except this time it was anti legal immigrant as well. Who the hell in their right mind with any sort of intelligence does that and THEN pipes up so loud for the nemesis of his previous ideas now? What the hell IS Harry Reid?

Limbaugh calls him "Dingy" Harry. Seems pretty right on. Today Rush had a field day with this whole issue. His callers for the most part played their part and brought up good points and the tele prompter did just fine until a woman called and said that anything less then amnesty was not acceptable. She exclaimed that she was a Wall Street Journal Republican and that the radio cons were being beyond fringe with the debate surrounding the border and immigration. Rush's equipment bugged out so it was hard for him to respond to her. She faintly scoffed at the tele prompter failure, I laughed out loud, and he had time to recoup and come back at her. His hearing issue seems to come up alot when there is an articulate debater set to take audio stage for us all to marvel at while Rush stutters and stammers about before he finally can sock it to 'em. He did come up with a funny idea today that I thought was worth mentioning. At the end of the three hour program there was a caller from Redding CA who resides in Mexico. The caller explained how difficult it is to actually live down there but he thought the lifestyle was worth all of the red tape. Rush then took the chance to give his immigration rules that he had thrown out to the audience in the first hour. Some of them were: Only investors and professionals with huge sums of wealth may immigrate, You can not vote, You can not run for political office, There are no welfare opportunities, The government can seize and reclaim your property at any time, Protesting is punishable by imprisonment, If you are an ILLEGAL immigrant you are thrown in jail, You MUST have knowledge of the native tongue. These are Mexico's rules for non Mexican's to live in their beautiful country. Hogwash!

Mexico also has ILLEGAL immigrant problems but seeing as no American in their right mind wants to sneak into Mexico to wallow on the lap of poverty and their southern border is a fraction of ours it is easier for them to handle the problem. A couple of weeks ago a group of Cubans were apprehended in Mexico. When Vicente tried to give them back, Castro gave the "Scalia" up through the beard and said, "No way". At Mexico's southern border they deport people back over the line to their South and Central American countries of origin. Latino's stretched hand to hand uniting for the betterment of their people. ILLEGALs in Mexico are not tolerated. Why is it that we are supposed to tolerate it here?

This three tier amnesty crapolla that is getting pushed about in Congress and could be up for a vote as early as Friday morning is pathetic. Anyone proudly pontificating the proposed pockmark is shameful and need to be held accountable. Las Vegas' Leisure Suit Harry needs to be held accountable. Dan Stein (http://www.steinreport.com/) along with F.A.I.R. (Federation for American Immigration Reform) helped Senator Reid sculpt his '93-'94 debacle. Mr. Stein's sources in Congress are referring to the current legislation as the "Rip Van Winkle" bill. I'd say that sums it up. In forty years we will have a projected 140 million ILLEGAL immigrants in the country. What then? Will our legislators being debating sign and fence placement because of environmental concerns like they are now? The new bill has too many details and rules to make it legitimate. Congressmen are pulling the velvet material tight to cover their asses while shouting, " Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain". John Kobylt (John and Ken Show, KFI640AM.com) referred to the current maze of rum soaked raisins and shenanigans that Congress is trying to pass off as rules and guidelines to "earned citizenship" as "little kids who have been drinking". Washington D.C. the new drunk playground. Teddy should fit in great. Just don't push his swing too high.

What will they pass? What gets approved? I hope the President is in better shape on "veto or not to veto" day then he was today when he answered questions about the immigration bill and he responded by saying he was pleased with the comprehensive energy bill that Congress was pushing. MMMMM.

Time's cover is the Statue of Liberty with her hand out palm faced away from her visage. "Stop in the name of Love", The whole series of articles is pretty sympathetic to the ILLEGAL immigrant cause. The first page of the article is the picture of a Latino using a gigantic American flag as some sort of cape or hang gliding apparatus. Uuugghh! There are lots of pictures, lots of graphs and lots of give peace a chance. The next ILLEGAL immigrant piece I write I am going to focus on the "head of lettuce" theory of economics which shows how high the grocery costs will soar once we eliminate ILLEGAL labor in the U.S.A.

Speaking of costs where is all of the moolah going to come from in order to incorporate this three prong, three count, three category spread sheet of who, when, how and what color is the card? There is way too much Big Government Bureaucracy Bullcrap being created by this. Do mini guns really cost more then all of those office dwellers and red tape stickers that will inevitably dissolve into a bigger mess then we already have? We are still processing people and their paperwork from the amnesty granted in the '80's. I am really not comfortable with my great grand children having to pay for the lack of height and might our Congress exhibits towards ILLEGAL immigration. It is sad.

We can win. Things have a way of working out. At least I am not waiting for Xenu or Hale Bopp and that makes it ok for now.

Fa-fa-fa-Friday! Fa-fa-fa-Friday! Hehehehehehe! I can't wait. What will bubble boil bump and bounce through the cranium. Unlike Rush I will use both sides when I tic tac tic it out tomorrow ...