It is still too hot and muggy. Zek has left but left the heat. The kitchen can not get far enough away. There are lots of things to talk about and write about but the heat is killing me. I will leave some of the colder topics for another time and take today to embrace the hottest topic in the current events category.
Gay Marriage Amendment.
It will not happen. There is no way that the 2/3rd majority that is needed will be had. These stuffed shirts can’t make a luncheon decision about tuna verses ham, what makes us think they are going to band together on this very controversial subject.
That is exactly what the intent of this subject's revisit is all about: banding together the conservative right.
The REAL debate has now become an argument over a word. One simple word with highly religious connotations and connections. In a society and culture where we do not choose our words well to begin with, so why is this one word causing so much fuss?
We can not, as a general rule of thumb, distinguish, in everyday conversation, the difference between: Work and Job, Incident and Accident, Affect and Effect, Sensual and Sensuous, Awesome and Incredible. We are an illiterate nation addicted to the damn thesaurus and use that said tool very, very poorly. It is sad that a bunch of people, on both sides, or are not as bright as they would like you to believe and are going to argue over one friggin’ word and how to use it. It is like a room full of three year olds arguing over which side gets the car keys.
But here everyone is demanding that marriage be an umbrella term. For this I will dust off the ol’ leather bound Webster’s New Twentieth Century Dictionary of the English Language - Unabridged (co. 1952 World Publishing Company; Cleveland, New York).Incidentally, it has nothing to do with a black kid living in the Popodopaulos house. Ok Marriage. When I type that all I can think of is the wedding scene in the Princess Bride. Marriage. Seriously, this is a very long definition but it helps to know what we are talking about and you might find it worth the read or at least interesting. Before Malcolm Little could become Malcolm X he needed to learn all of the words and their meanings. He wasn’t so stupid in the end now was he? Let’s turn to page 1037:
Marriage (-rij), n. [OFr. mariage, from LL. Maritaticum, marriage, from L. maritus, husband.]
1. The act of uniting a man and a woman for life; wedlock; the legal union of a man and a woman for life.
2. A feast made on the occasion of a marriage.
3. A close or intimate union of any kind.
4. A marriage contract or betrothal. [Obs.]
“Marriage brokage”: the act of negotiating a marriage for a third party, or parties, or the fee paid for such negotiation.
“Marriage contract”: a) a promissory engagement to marry; b) a formal and legal contract specifying conditions as to property rights of the contracting parties.
“Marriage favors”: flowers, ribbons, or other gifts distributed to wedding guests.
“Marriage settlement”: in law, a disposal of property preliminary to, or as a consideration for, marriage.
“Civil Marriage”: a marriage legalized by a civil officer, as a judge or justice of the peace.
“Common-law marriage”: a marriage by mutual agreement of the parties without formal ceremony, and provable by their subsequent conduct, such as living together as man and wife, acknowledging their relation before other, etc.
“Morganatic marriage”: marriage between a man of high rank and a woman of lower rank, contracted with the agreement that neither the wife nor any offspring of the marriage shall ever inherit the rank, title, or property of the husband.
“Scotch marriage”: a marriage by mutual agreement between a man and a woman without being formally solemnized, such marriage being recognized by Scotch law.
Syn. - Matrimony, wedding, wedlock, nuptials. - Marriage is the act that unites two parties , and matrimony the state into which they enter.
Further down in column two we find the uses and meanings of “marry”. Since the word marry is used in the definition, let’s look at those definitions as well, shall we!
Marry, v.t.; married, pt., pp.; marrying, ppr. [ME. maryen, marien; OFr. Marier, from L. maritare, to wed, marry, from maritus, husband.]
1. To unite in wedlock and matrimony; to join for life, as a man to a woman, or a woman to a man; to constitute man and wife according to the laws or customs of a nation.
2. To dispose of in wedlock.
3.To take for husband or wife; as, a man marries a woman; or, a woman marries a man.
4. Figuratively, to unite intimately or by some close bond or connection ~ “married to immortal verse” - Milton.
5. Nautically, to splice, as two ropes in such a manner that ends will pass freely through a block.
Marry, v.i. To enter into the conjugal state; to unite as a husband and wife; to take a husband or wife.
Marry, interj. Indeed; forsooth; a term of asseveration derived from the practice of swearing by the Virgin Mary.
Lot’s to take in, huh? A lot to know and put into perspective as well as needing to “marry” these definitions with the current interpretations and slang uses also used amongst us in today’s culture. Such as, “He’s a big Mary”. That does not apply. Well unless we are going to refer to the navy reference in definition 5 of Marry in which case it is just a big ol’ Village People bash, now isn’t it? NO! That is wrong and I was only doing it in order to shed a shard of humor into this very serious discussion. Plus reading definitions can make some people feisty.
The three definitions or references that would apply regarding gay marriage are definition 3: “a close or intimate union of any kind”. I think this works hand and hand with the figurative definition 4 under Marry. You can marry together flavors in a recipe. You can marry together different music genres on a mix CD. I am almost positive that is what is being pointed to in this definition. That leads us to the other two: Civil Marriage and Common-law Marriage. However these two word terms directly refer back to the first definition of the word "marriage" which require a man and woman, but we will bend the rules to make a point since the rules are already bent regarding these two terms. These two are what is on the table already in many states but with the word “union” used to replace “marriage”, a word commonly used in religious context. Why would homosexuals who are supposedly demonized by the religious right want to be affiliated with a word that is a word belonging to the church? That is like a Jew wanting to be a member of a National Socialist Workers Party?!?!?!?!?!?! It just makes no sense.
The big debate can only logically lead us to that of a fiscal nature. It must be about health benefits, taxes, estates, custody and guardian ship of children, death wishes, retirement, social security. That has to do with the civil marriage or common law variety NOT the other kinds that require a holy ceremony.
I understand that everyone has rights. I have two sets of unioned gay parents. I understand their points of view on this as well as the need to hold the sanctity of marriage high above just a hand out to anyone. Hell, most heterosexuals should not be married either it doesn’t make it right to decrease the standard of requirement or accomplishment just to let everyone into the club. That is what is happening to graduation standards here in California and pretty soon a High School diploma will mean jack shit. Do we really want marriage - the holy ceremony of union and dedication - to become jack shit as well? With divorce so common and multiple marriages plentiful along with the non chalant attitude taken when it comes to modern marriage; haven't we already degraded it enough. Maybe that is why it is so easy to let everyone do it. I want to marry my cat. Zoe and I will send out invitations soon, please RSVP in the name of equality and diversity!
We, as a society, degrade, belittle, minimize, shred, and piss all over anything that requires a set of standards or roles. We call this equality and freedom. I call it bullshit.
We are all human beings but beyond that we are NOT equal. We take the poorest and try to make us all that poor. We take the crazy and make us all insane. We take the stupid and dumb down all of our abilities. We take the extreme and make it common place. We are so different and diverse that we all now have little PC name tags tucked into the back of our shirts. All of our summer camp undies are sharpied with our own unique labels.
When talking to a fervent and passionate exclaimer of equality you normally find that from the other side of their mouth is being spouted the acceptance of diversity. How can we all be equal AND diverse? Simple. By allowing and accepting the differences of each individual along with the pros and cons of being whatever that is. Ask a handicap person how difficult it is to be different yet how rewarding the other areas that they excel in are.
I actually know of a couple that is refusing to get married until everyone can. Great protest. Was that thought up on the Bullwinkle show the day Rocky called in sick?
It's ok! Who needs marriage? We should all juast shack up and shag ourselves silly! Why not? Who needs anything having to do with family when we have SUVs, cell phones, crystal meth, and the Rolling Stone magazine. Everyone should have a big velvet shag den blaring MTV all day long with 9,000 phones that all dial in and vote on American Idol for us because we are sooooo buzy screwing on the floor to make children who will eat people alive becasue they will be too impatient to actually take the time to commit the sin of killing before they take part in cannabilism! Let the games begin!
We are going to rage on over the difference between “union” and “marriage”? Why not just count the chips and mark it up to fair play as opposed to the stacking of the deck? Not everything in life is a rigged game that we need to offer condolences and reparations for. Life is not fair. Simple.
I know a lot of you will not be happy about the words I have spouted off here. I spoke from the heart. You might also find it interesting, if you have even made it this far with out clicking me off your screen, that I do not think a constitutional amendment regarding this is a good thing. On a federal level we do need fiscal recognition of unions and marriages hence the dandy little license we all have to apply for when we go through the production of it all but beyond that it should be up to the states. Maybe some day the state thinking that I, and others like me, have will lead to a split in this country bigger than that between the Palestinians and the Israelis but it needs to be left to the state regarding terminology.
If there are a hundred people in one state and 99 of them go to church, hate abortion, despise gays, and like Sunday picnics for all the citizens. The one church scoffing, pro choice, homosexual who hates picnics should move to a state of like minded people. Common ground has always been the platform for gathering, thriving and surviving. You don’t see me moving to Harlem or East L.A do you? No, because I would be judged, disliked, and probably harassed and quite possibly hurt. It makes no sense. It would not be a pleasurable existence for me to live my days out enduring.
State issue? Constitutional issue? Am I insane? Do I hate people? Do I just have my head up my ass?
Answer them if you want.
Name calling is a good way to resolve issues with too much emotion. I try to stay smart. I try to use logic.
I’m here, and I am just me.
They don’t have parades or slogans for heterosexual white guys who just want to be left alone and are happy letting everyone go about their business inside their own abodes.
Maybe I should ask back Zek. He was doing a better job.
Cat in the hat? Nope just some familial pride. I’ll keep wearing that hat til Wednesday when maybe I’ll broach the subject of feminism and really piss you all off …