I wanted to write a dribble drabble of word volley for today’s post. I thought about phrases and words that conflict so highly beyond what we intend them to be, words and phrases that are in their own right - hypocritical.
I have stayed away from politics so much lately and upon viewing my insight to them, reading blogs, reading papers and magazines, watching the news (more than the jelly on toast minutes that I get in the a.m.), and listening to a bit of Saturday radio (which is not the same as day to day radio during the week - much more fluffy); I want to comment, I need to comment. I will, however, refrain. I am a good boy, all said and done.
I would like to ask a couple of questions in order to seed plant an idea or two for a post I will be surely putting up come the end of September. I think of Wyclef Jean and then I get back on subject point.
The two return of phrase twist, razor wire lexicon, verbal vermillion bolley that I think of constantly are:
Racism vs. Reverse-Racism.
And the battle of …
Tolerance vs. Non-Tolerance.
I have been told to steer the ship hard, and to the port side, in order to avoid this rant. Much more so than feminism or homosexual marriage. I bared down and held the wheel strong and hard. I will go into the topic head strong. I like a challenge at high sea. The compus jiggles so hard that maybe only the BS Capt’n can hold it straight, but I fight that damn spiked wooden guidance derivative of the high seas and know it needs to be said.
Funny beards, rum and whores!
Think hard of the term racism. What does it mean to you? To me, it means the feeling of one’s race to be superior over one, or more, races. Racism. Pretty simple, huh? If I were to bust out the Webster big book of leather bounding and binding, than I know it would back me up. That is the definition of it. This is a commentary piece, not one of fact juggle reassurance, so I think that that definition is good enough for the debate at hand.
So, with that definition in mind, the resulting definition for reverse-racism is: The feeling of one’ s race to be inferior to another race or many others. Right? Are you with me so far? Do you get and grasp the handle in front which desires grasping?
If a white man is a decimator and over bearer of discrimination, than he is a perpetrator of racism. If he feels the same sentiment back from any other race he is a victim of reverse-racism, right? Horribly wrong!
If an African-American, a Hispanic-American, or a Asian-American perpetuates racism on a Caucasian-American than it is reverse-racism, which does not jive by the definition previously defined, through simplicity, as such.
Racism is racism.
There is no ‘reverse-racism’.
Racism is bad whether or not it comes from some white guy. It can be given forth from a black man, a brown man, a yellow man, a purple man, or a plaid man. Racism is just what it is - bad news!
Do you get what I am pointing out? When we use the term ‘reverse-racism’ to provide a phrase for something bad administered to a white man on behalf of a racist of another ethnocentricity, than the implication is that it is not racism, it is the opposite. This is what lexicon and verbiage abuse has done to our society. It has led us to believe that only white men are guilty of racism. That is simply a load of shit, bull hockey, horse puckey, crap, and garbage!
This brings me to point two:
Tolerance vs. Non-Tolerance.
We all try to be tolerant. We all want to tolerate of the other’s that do not see eye to eye with our dementia and dimensions. We all want to be tolerated with our idiosyncrasies and eccentricities that allow us to be us, who we are. This is simply not the case.
Ok.
Look at it this way: To be truly tolerant we have to be tolerant of those who are not tolerant. This is utopian at best. In being not tolerant of those who are not tolerant, you become non-tolerant. Right?
Maybe not, but I will give an example that may work better for this than others may:
Say I hate purple people. You like purple people, and are a self proclaimed tolerant person. In order to accept me, and be tolerant, you must then accept my dislike of purple people. Unless I am the famed ‘purple people eater’, then you are kinda screwed.
It is a great example of the transitive property of mathematics. ‘If A equals B and B equals C, then , of course, A equals C’. Right? Does that make sense?
Math does not lie. It gives us insight. The greatest philosophers of our time were mathematicians. This is what we forge on through the ice cold fjords to make truth. Aristotle, Archimedes, Hippocrates, Euclid, Ptolemy, Zeno of Elea, Thalos, Plato, Cleomedes, Hypatia, Heraclides of Pontus, Proclus, and Pappus would all agree. They would actually give me a frat name and make me do keg stands while I wonder which broad I shall ruffie and get down with. That is not to belittle them but to make fun of the seriousness of it all, I figured I might need a ‘key’ or ‘legend’ for my posts these days.
It is simple; you can be a prick to one and not the other, and claim you are of ‘prick-less’ nature, unless you are Eunuch of Crete. That is a subject for another time though. I am not tap dancing this. I am not named Greg. Mel will check in later, even though she hates that nick-name, and this Mel is not her. And there we are, back to nick names as subject from posts ago.
Did anyone else do math that much?
Did anyone else dig calculus, or ‘Cal-Cool-Us’ as Edward James Almos calls it in the film “Stand and Deliver”?
I took it to phase two. I took advanced physics. I studied logic and statistics at University. They were the classes that I took form from , even if I did not participate in them as far as test scores would imply.
Math is that thing that we will all need when we move on. It is really something that could save you someday.
Math aside , although that is extremely hard to do - if not impossible, look at the logic of it.
Math is logic - sorry to burst bubbles and walk away evil.
Think of what I have table tossed on this Sunday night. Take it to court or core and make it work.
Know it to be the thing that makes sense.
Know what I say to have thought behind it, not anger.
I am sure this stirs debate or thought, if not I would not jibber-jabber it with such seriousness.
Be good.
Smile …